From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abram v. Mission

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Aug 29, 2008
No. 13-07-133-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. 13-07-133-CV

Opinion delivered and filed August 29, 2008.

On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Justices GARZA, BENAVIDES, and VELA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on May 16, 2008. On June 3, 2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief. To date, appellants have neither filed their brief in this matter nor otherwise responded to the Court's notices.

Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file brief, or file their brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Abram v. Mission

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Aug 29, 2008
No. 13-07-133-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Abram v. Mission

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF ABRAM, ET AL., Appellants, v. CITY OF MISSION, TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Aug 29, 2008

Citations

No. 13-07-133-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2008)