Opinion
No. 110420 (27)(34).
September 19, 2000.
COA: 199293, Michigan, LC: 94-79109-AP.
By orders of September 15, 1998, December 21, 1999 and February 1, 2000, the Court respectively held the application for leave to appeal in abeyance pending the decision in Glover v Parole Board (In re Glover), 460 Mich. 511 (1999); resolved the abeyance by directing the defendant to file a response to the application addressing specified issues, allowing the plaintiff to file a reply brief and taking the plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel under advisement; and extended the time for the plaintiff to file any reply brief. The defendant having filed a response to the application, and an attorney having appeared on plaintiff's behalf and filed a reply brief, the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to appoint counsel is DENIED as moot.
Young, Jr., J., not participating.