From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abraham v. Bd. of Parole & Post Prison Supervision

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Oct 23, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-00198-YY (D. Or. Oct. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-00198-YY

10-23-2018

DWAYNE EDWARD ABRAHAM, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [35] on July 29, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court deny Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [2] and enter a judgment of dismissal. Judge You also recommends denying a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Petitioner filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Pet'r Obj., ECF 37. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Petitioner's objections and concludes there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation [35] . Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [2] is DENIED and this case is dismissed with prejudice. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 23 day of October, 2018.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Abraham v. Bd. of Parole & Post Prison Supervision

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Oct 23, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-00198-YY (D. Or. Oct. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Abraham v. Bd. of Parole & Post Prison Supervision

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE EDWARD ABRAHAM, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Oct 23, 2018

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-00198-YY (D. Or. Oct. 23, 2018)

Citing Cases

Cotten v. Thornell

Courts are reluctant to apply the doctrine to habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Huff v. Ryan, No. CV…