Opinion
No. 3:17-cv-00198-YY
10-23-2018
ORDER :
Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [35] on July 29, 2018, in which she recommends that this Court deny Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [2] and enter a judgment of dismissal. Judge You also recommends denying a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Petitioner filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Pet'r Obj., ECF 37. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Petitioner's objections and concludes there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation [35] . Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [2] is DENIED and this case is dismissed with prejudice. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 23 day of October, 2018.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge