From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abraham Bros. v. Means

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 2, 1918
78 So. 459 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)

Opinion

3 Div. 216.

April 2, 1918.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; W.W. Pearson, Judge.

On second application for rehearing. Application overruled. For former opinion, see ante, p. 42, 75 So. 187.

Steiner, Crum Well, of Montgomery, for appellant. Hill, Hill, Whiting Stern, of Montgomery, for appellee.


This case was carried to the Supreme Court on certiorari, and by that court reversed and remanded to this court for further action. We are now asked to pass upon the questions not considered in the first opinion. Abraham Bros. v. Noah Means, ante, p. 42, 75 So. 187.

The cause was tried on two counts; count 2 claiming for a breach of warranty, and count 3 for money had and received. There was nothing to indicate that the claims as set out were for inconsistent remedies growing out of the same transaction. The complaint therefore was not subject to demurrer on that ground. Code 1907, § 5328. Issue being joined on both counts, and there being evidence tending to sustain each of the counts, the refusal to give the affirmative charge as to either count was not error. Both counts being before the jury, and there being evidence tending to support each, the court properly charged on the law as applicable to each count.

Where it develops on the trial that there are counts in the complaint asserting inconsistent remedies growing out of the same transaction, the court, on motion, will require the plaintiff to elect as to which remedy he will pursue, but the defendant did not make this motion, but allowed the trial to proceed to judgment.

Application overruled.


Summaries of

Abraham Bros. v. Means

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 2, 1918
78 So. 459 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
Case details for

Abraham Bros. v. Means

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM BROS. v. MEANS

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 2, 1918

Citations

78 So. 459 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
78 So. 459

Citing Cases

Webb v. Litz

"All actions on contracts, express or implied, for the payment of money, whether under seal or not, though…

Sealy v. McElroy

The purchaser of an existing house is protected as to its quality and condition in an action Ex Contractu…