From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abrahall v. Open Source Matters, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 7, 2022
22-CV-4086 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 7, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-4086 (RA)

06-07-2022

ROWAN HOSKYNS ABRAHALL, Plaintiff, v. OPEN SOURCE MATTERS INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF SERVICE

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, alleging defamation, publication of private facts, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. By order dated May 31, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees.

Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, they are entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)).

Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served the summons and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that the summons be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date the summons is issued.

If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons is issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff's responsibility to request an extension of time for service).

Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if their address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so.

To allow Plaintiff to effect service on the defendants through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for the defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to mail an information package to Plaintiff, and to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon the defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Abrahall v. Open Source Matters, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 7, 2022
22-CV-4086 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Abrahall v. Open Source Matters, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROWAN HOSKYNS ABRAHALL, Plaintiff, v. OPEN SOURCE MATTERS INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 7, 2022

Citations

22-CV-4086 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 7, 2022)