From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abner v. Nangalama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0869 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0869 KJM KJN P

07-06-2012

MICHAEL ABNER, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed May 22, 2012, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

______________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
abne0869.fta


Summaries of

Abner v. Nangalama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0869 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Abner v. Nangalama

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ABNER, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0869 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)