From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ablo v. Durango School District No. 9-R

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 30, 2006
Civil Case No. 05-cv-2044-REB-OES (D. Colo. Jan. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 05-cv-2044-REB-OES.

January 30, 2006


TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER


Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 43.1, and REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.A.1., the court enters this Trial Preparation Conference Order. IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That in order to resolve pretrial issues implicating Fed.R.Evid. 702, the following procedural protocol shall be used:

a. That expert reports shall conform in substance to the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B) and shall contain and include the following:

1. a complete statement of each expert opinion to be expressed and the bases and reasons therefor;

2. the data or other information considered by the witness in forming each expert opinion;

3. any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for each expert opinion;

4. the qualifications of the witness, including a list of all publications authored by the witness within the preceding ten years, stated in a curriculum vitae ("c.v.");

5. the compensation to be paid the expert for the study and testimony; and

6. a listing of any other cases in which the witness has testified as an expert at trial or by deposition within the preceding four years;

b. That all motions raising issues under Fed.R.Evid. 702 as codified and construed shall be filed by October 1, 2006, and marshaled thereafter as prescribed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C;

c. That for each putative expert witness with respect to whom the movant objects for any reason, the movant shall provide the following:

1. whether the movant contends that the testimony of the expert is unnecessary; and if so, why;

2. whether the movant objects to the qualifications of the witness; and if so, why (stated in detail); and

3. whether the movant objects to any opinion to be offered by the expert; and if so:

a. which opinion; and

b. the specific basis for any objection stated and presented in terms of Fed.R.Evid. 702(1), (2), or (3), i.e., whether the objection impugns the sufficiency of the facts and data used in support of the opinion, whether the objection impugns the principles and methods on which the expert relied in support of the opinion, or whether the objection impugns how the expert has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion; and

d. That for each putative expert witness whose necessity, qualifications, or opinions are opposed by the movant, the party offering the expert shall provide in response to the motion the following:

1. a c.v.for the expert;

2. a statement of each opinion to be offered by the expert that is opposed by the movant; and

3. the bases for each allegedly objectionable statement to be offered by the expert, including

a. the facts or data on which the expert relied in support of the opinion made the focus and subject of objection;

b. the principles and methods on which the expert relied in support of the opinion made the focus and subject of objection; and

c. how the expert has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion made the focus and subject of objection;

2. That trial by jury shall commence April 23, 2007, at 8:30 a.m., in courtroom A701, located on the 7th Floor North, of the Alfred A. Arraj, United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado;

3. That the court reserves eight (8) days for trial:
• Monday, April 23, 2007, through Thursday, April 26, 2007; and
• Monday, April 30, 2007, through Thursday, May 3, 2007;

4. That counsel and any pro se party shall appear in courtroom A701 on the first day of trial at 8:00 a.m., to review the Trial Checklist with the courtroom deputy clerk;

5. That the Trial Preparation Conference required by REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.C.1., shall commence on March 30, 2007, at 9:30 a.m., in courtroom A701;

6. That lead counsel and any pro se party shall attend the Trial Preparation Conference;

7. That at the outset of the Trial Preparation conference, each party shall submit on the Witness List form required by the court (an original for the court with copies to all other parties);

8. That at the Trial Preparation Conference the parties shall be prepared to review and discuss, inter alia, the following:

a. stipulated and proposed jury instructions and verdict forms;

b. voir dire questions;

c. the jury selection process, including peremptory challenges and the use of juror questionnaires;

d. identification of all persons permitted to be seated at each party's table;

e. the pronunciation of problematic party's and witness' names;

f. the names or monikers that may be used when referring to a party or a witness;

g. identification of "will call" and "may call" witnesses;

h. use of deposition testimony:

1. designation of specific testimony by page and line; and

2. identification of the person selected to read deposition answers;

i. use of video depositions:

1. resolution of objections;

2. pretrial redaction, if necessary; and

3. arrangements for necessary equipment to broadcast the deposition;

j. the allocation of trial time between the parties;

k. the admission of stipulated exhibits or exhibits about which there are no objections;

l. the use of juror trial exhibit notebooks and the timing of the distribution of such notebooks;

m. timing of publication, if any, of trial exhibits to the jury;

n. anticipated evidentiary issues;

o. the necessity for cautionary or limiting instructions; and

p. requests or requirement for trial briefs;

9. That each side shall be permitted voir dire examination not to exceed 15 minutes following voir dire examination by the court, but shall not reiterate questions previously propounded by the court or another party;

10. That pending further court order, the jurors shall not be sequestered before deliberations;

11. That trial witnesses subject to sequestration under Fed.R.Evid. 615 shall be sequestered by order entered sua sponte immediately before opening statements;

12. That opening statements shall be limited to thirty (30) minutes per party;

13. That the court will not engage in the examination of any witness, except to eschew plain error;

14. That pursuant to REB Civ. Practice Standard III.D.4., each party shall have available at trial a set of exhibits for the court, the courtroom deputy clerk, opposing counsel (one set per party), and any pro se party;

15. That objections made in the presence or hearing of the jury, i.e., so-called "speaking" objections, shall be stated as succinctly as practicable and supported by recitation of apposite authority when possible; however, neither counsel nor a pro se party shall speechify an objection in the presence or hearing of the jury [Review F.R.E. 103(c) and 104(c)];

16. That in marshaling motions or objections during trial, the following sequential protocol shall be observed: objection, response, reply, ruling;

17. That consistent with Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(2), once the court makes a definitive ruling on the record admitting or excluding evidence, either at or before trial, a request that the court note a standing or continuing objection to that same evidence will not be granted;

18. That to eliminate or minimize bench or sidebar conferences, each side shall be responsible to inform the courtroom deputy clerk at the conclusion of a trial day about any issue which should be considered before commencing trial on the next scheduled day of trial and at the outset of a trial day about any issue which should be considered at the conclusion of that trial day;

19. That to facilitate preparation, marshaling, and consideration of proposed jury instructions and verdict forms, the parties shall identify and enumerate each individual jury instruction in the heading or title as specified in REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.E.4.; provided, furthermore, the parties shall similarly identify and enumerate all proposed verdict forms and special interrogatories;

20. That closing argument shall be limited to forty-five (45) minutes total for each party; and

21. That pursuant to REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.A.2.b., the Final Pretrial Order as modified or supplemented by this Trial Preparation Conference Order and any order entered during the trial preparation conference shall control the subsequent course of this action and the trial, and may not be amended except by consent of the parties and approval of the court or by order of the court to prevent manifest injustice.


Summaries of

Ablo v. Durango School District No. 9-R

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 30, 2006
Civil Case No. 05-cv-2044-REB-OES (D. Colo. Jan. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Ablo v. Durango School District No. 9-R

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO ABLO, TONY ALBO, ORLANDO LUJAN, and LADY SKORSKI, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 30, 2006

Citations

Civil Case No. 05-cv-2044-REB-OES (D. Colo. Jan. 30, 2006)