From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abizadeh v. Abizadeh

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2018
159 A.D.3d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2016–01567 Index No. 203117/09

03-21-2018

Ramin ABIZADEH, appellant, v. Galit ABIZADEH, respondent.

Ramin Abizadeh, Roslyn Heights, NY, appellant pro se. Law Offices of Seidner & Associates, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Matthew S. Seidner of counsel), for respondent.


Ramin Abizadeh, Roslyn Heights, NY, appellant pro se.

Law Offices of Seidner & Associates, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Matthew S. Seidner of counsel), for respondent.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, SANDRA L. SGROI, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDERAppeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Hope Schwartz Zimmerman, J.), entered December 22, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the plaintiff's motion for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The background of this action is stated in Abizadeh v. Abizadeh, 159 A.D.3d 856, 72 N.Y.S.3d 566, 2018 WL 1404294 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2015–11360 ; decided herewith] ). Insofar as relevant to this appeal, prior to the entry of the judgment of divorce, the Supreme Court issued an order dated July 12, 2013, which, inter alia, imputed income to the plaintiff in the amount of $165,000 per annum. The judgment of divorce, entered in May 2014, provided, inter alia, that the plaintiff's child support obligation was in the sum of $4,009 per month. In November 2015, the plaintiff moved for a downward modification of that support obligation. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, inter alia, denied the plaintiff's motion. The plaintiff appeals.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion, as he failed to establish the existence of a substantial change in circumstances warranting a downward modification of his child support obligation (see Family Ct Act § 451[3][b][ii] ; Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][9][b][2][ii][B] ; Matter of Fantau v. Fantau, 134 A.D.3d 1109, 1110, 21 N.Y.S.3d 725 ; Raab v. Raab, 129 A.D.3d 1050, 1051, 11 N.Y.S.3d 678 ).

BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and LASALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Abizadeh v. Abizadeh

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2018
159 A.D.3d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Abizadeh v. Abizadeh

Case Details

Full title:Ramin ABIZADEH, appellant, v. Galit ABIZADEH, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 21, 2018

Citations

159 A.D.3d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
70 N.Y.S.3d 54
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 1893

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Murphy

The plaintiff's evidence, which included evidence that the Ireland property, which remained titled in the…

MacIntyre v. Wing

The Supreme Court denied the motion, and the defendant appeals.We agree with the Supreme Court's denial of…