From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abi-Habib v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.
Jul 26, 2018
25 Cal.App.5th 587 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. C085308.

07-26-2018

RICHARD ABI-HABIB et al., Real Parties in Interest. BUTTE FIRE CASES.PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent


[Modification of opinion (25 Cal.App.5th 251; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]

THE COURT. — It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 13, 2018, be modified as follows:

1. On page 2, in the first paragraph of the section entitled "BACKGROUND" [25 Cal.App.5th 255, advance report, 4th full par., line 6], the word "not" in the quotation in the second full sentence is to be underlined, so it will now read: "not subject to sales tax."

2. On page 9, in the paragraph commencing with the words "In contrast" the fourth full sentence [25 Cal.App.5th 261, advance report, 2d par., lines 9-10] which beings with the words "As counsel for the Board advised this court" is deleted and the following sentence is inserted in its place: "There appear to be many such letters issued each year."

The petition for rehearing filed July 30, 2018, is denied. There is no change in the judgment.


Summaries of

Abi-Habib v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.
Jul 26, 2018
25 Cal.App.5th 587 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Abi-Habib v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ABI-HABIB et al., Real Parties in Interest. BUTTE FIRE…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Date published: Jul 26, 2018

Citations

25 Cal.App.5th 587 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018)