" (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Abernathy v. State, 192 Ga. App. 355, 356 (2) ( 385 SE2d 25) (1989). The wide range of discussion permitted in closing argument, however, "does have its limitations, the first and foremost of which is the longstanding prohibition against the injection into the argument of extrinsic and prejudicial matters which have no basis in the evidence."
" (Punctuation omitted.) Abernathy v. State, 192 Ga. App. 355, 356 ( 385 S.E.2d 25) (1989) (prosecutor's comment that officer would not testify and risk perjury prosecution unless he were telling the truth not "so improper as to require a mistrial"). The district attorney's argument was therefore not improper.
OCGA ยง 24-4-4." Abernathy v. State, 192 Ga. App. 355, 356 ( 385 S.E.2d 25) (1989). We conclude that the prosecutor's argument was within the bounds of the law and does not warrant reversal of appellant's conviction.