Summary
In Abel v. Delaware Hudson Canal Co., 128 N.Y. 664, the Court says: "The rule that the servant takes the risk of the business is subject to the qualification that the master must exercise reasonable care to guard the servant while engaged in his duties, from unnecessary hazards, including hazards from negligence of co-employees.
Summary of this case from Maryland Clay Co. v. GoodnowOpinion
Argued June 2, 1891
Decided October 27, 1891
Edwin Young for appellant.
Jesse S. L'Amoreaux and Nathaniel C. Moak for respondent.
ANDREWS, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except EARL and GRAY, JJ., who dissent on the ground of error in charge, and PECKHAM, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.