From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ABEL v. MARTEL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 27, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1749 JAM GGH (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1749 JAM GGH (TEMP) P.

April 27, 2011


ORDER


On April 5, 2011, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why defendant Rodriguez should not be dismissed because he has not yet been served with process. Plaintiff responded to the order to show cause on April 18, 2011. In the response, plaintiff requests additional time to serve defendant Rodriguez. Plaintiff asserts additional time is necessary to obtain information required for service though discovery.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The order to show cause issued on April 5, 2011 is discharged; and

2. Plaintiff shall file a status report regarding service of process on defendant Rodriguez no later than sixty days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

ABEL v. MARTEL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 27, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1749 JAM GGH (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)
Case details for

ABEL v. MARTEL

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ABEL, Plaintiff, v. MIKE MARTEL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 27, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1749 JAM GGH (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)