From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ABEL v. MARTEL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 26, 2011
No. CIV-S-09-1749 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-09-1749 JAM CKD P.

September 26, 2011


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


On April 27, 2011, plaintiff was granted sixty days to file a status report regarding service of process on defendant Rodriguez, but no report has been filed. Since process has not been served, and it does not appear that service will take place, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Rodriguez be dismissed from this action.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

ABEL v. MARTEL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 26, 2011
No. CIV-S-09-1749 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)
Case details for

ABEL v. MARTEL

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ABEL, Plaintiff, v. MIKE MARTEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 26, 2011

Citations

No. CIV-S-09-1749 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)