From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abdullah v. Husbands

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted August 17, 1999

October 18, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garson, J.).


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment, as the issue of whether his car was being used with his permission at the time of the subject collision is one for the trier of fact (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388; Leotta v. Plessinger, 8 N.Y.2d 449, 461; Jimenez v. Regan, 248 A.D.2d 510; Walls v. Zuvic, 113 A.D.2d 936; Blunt v. Zinni, 32 A.D.2d 882, 883, affd 27 N.Y.2d 521; Lewis v. Caldwell, 236 A.D.2d 896).

S. MILLER, J.P., SULLIVAN, FRIEDMANN, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Abdullah v. Husbands

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Abdullah v. Husbands

Case Details

Full title:SALIM N. ABDULLAH, respondent, v. ANTHONY ORLANDO HUSBANDS, etc., appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 518

Citing Cases

Ford v. Guishard

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for…