From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abdullah v. City of Plant City Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jan 23, 2017
Case No: 8:16-cv-1182-T-27JSS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 23, 2017)

Opinion

Case No: 8:16-cv-1182-T-27JSS

01-23-2017

AL-RASHID MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PLANT CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendants.

Copies to: Pro Se Plaintiff, Counsel of Record


ORDER

BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. 22), which the Court construes as a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 23). Upon consideration, Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the construed Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint is GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint (Dkt. 22) is STRICKEN.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a court may, upon a finding of indigency, authorize the commencement of an action without requiring the prepayment of fees or security. Granting in forma pauperis status is discretionary. Pace v. Evans, 709 F.2d 1428, 1429 (11th Cir. 1983). "When considering a motion filed pursuant to § 1915(a), '[t]he only determination to be made by the court . . . is whether the statements in the affidavit satisfy the requirement of poverty.'" Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc., 364 F.3d 1305, 1307 (11th Cir. 2004) (quoting Watson v. Ault, 525 F.2d 886, 891 (5th Cir. 1976) (omissions in original).

Plaintiff's Affidavit of Indigency (Dkt. 23-1) states that he has been unemployed since December 2009, has $25.00 in total cash, and that he has monthly expenses of $450.00. He avers he owns one home and one GMC Sierra in full. In light of the foregoing, it appears Plaintiff does not have assets sufficient to pay the required filing fee as well as provide for himself and his two dependents. Accordingly, Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Plaintiff, in his Amended Complaint, also claims he owns a 2000 Chevy Impala valued at $1800 that he did not reveal on his Affidavit of Indigency. --------

Arguably, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint attempts to state a § 1983 claim for deprivation of property without due process. See e.g. Grayden v. Rhodes, 345 F.3d 1225, 1232 (11th Cir. 2003) ( a § 1983 claim alleging denial of due process requires "(1) a deprivation of a constitutionally-protected liberty or property interest; (2) state action; and (3) constitutionally-inadequate process") But, the Amended Complaint fails to comply with the pleading standards explicated in Atlantic Bell Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), as well as Rules 8 and 10, Fed. R. Civ. P. Each count in the Complaint incorporates all prior allegations, (see Dkt. 22 ¶¶ 20, 21, 22, 23, 24), a hallmark of a shotgun pleading, making it "'virtually impossible to know which allegations of fact are intended to support which claim(s) for relief.'" Paylor v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 748 F.3d 1117, 1125 (11th Cir. 2014) (quoting Anderson v. Dist. Bd. of Trs. of Cent. Fla. Cmty. Coll., 77 F.3d 364, 366 (11th Cir.1996)). The proper remedy for a shotgun complaint or a complaint that does not comply with Rule 8(a) is to strike the complaint and order a repleader. Paylor, 748 F.3d at 1125-27.

Plaintiff may wish to speak with a lawyer at the Legal Information Program operated by the Tampa Chapter of the Federal Bar Association on Tuesdays from 11:00-12:30 p.m. on the 2nd floor of the United States Courthouse, 801 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida. This is a free service for pro se litigants. Reservations for specific appointments may be made by calling (813) 301-5400; walk-ins are welcome if space is available. Additional resources are available for pro se litigants on the Court's website (www.flmd.uscourts.gov) under the right-side link "Proceeding without a Lawyer."

Accordingly, Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. the construed Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint is GRANTED, the Amended Complaint (Dkt. 22) is STRICKEN. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint within twenty (20) days.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of January, 2017.

/s/ _________

JAMES D. WHITTEMORE

United States District Judge Copies to:
Pro Se Plaintiff,
Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Abdullah v. City of Plant City Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jan 23, 2017
Case No: 8:16-cv-1182-T-27JSS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Abdullah v. City of Plant City Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:AL-RASHID MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PLANT CITY POLICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2017

Citations

Case No: 8:16-cv-1182-T-27JSS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 23, 2017)