From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abdullah v. Oaks Integrated Care

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 17, 2018
1:18-cv-13011-NLH-AMD (D.N.J. Sep. 17, 2018)

Opinion

1:18-cv-13011-NLH-AMD

09-17-2018

ASMAR SIDDIQ MUMIN ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, v. OAKS INTEGRATED CARE, JANICE STEINBECK, and JUDITH BRENNER, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: ASMAR SIDDIQ MUMIN ABDULLAH 450 STUYVESANT AVE. TRENTON, NJ 08618 Appearing pro se


MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

APPEARANCES:

ASMAR SIDDIQ MUMIN ABDULLAH
450 STUYVESANT AVE.
TRENTON, NJ 08618

Appearing pro se HILLMAN, District Judge

WHEREAS, on August 20, 2018, Plaintiff, Asmar Siddiq Mumin Abdullah, appearing pro se, filed a complaint against Defendants Oaks Integrated Care, Janice Steinbeck, and Judith Brenner; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed without prepayment of fees ("in forma pauperis" or "IFP" application) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); and

WHEREAS, the screening provisions of the IFP statute require a federal court to dismiss an action sua sponte if, among other things, the action is frivolous or malicious, or if it fails to comply with the proper pleading standards, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); Ball v. Famiglio, 726 F.3d 448, 452 (3d Cir. 2013); and

WHEREAS, on August 22, 2018, the Court screened Plaintiff's complaint and granted his IFP application, but found that Plaintiff's complaint was deficient because: (1) Plaintiff failed to properly state this Court's subject matter jurisdiction over his action; and (2) Plaintiff failed to state a specific legal basis for his claims, which is necessary to establish subject matter jurisdiction; (Docket No. 2); and

WHEREAS, the Court provided Plaintiff with twenty (20) days to amend his complaint to properly cure the deficiencies, but ordered that if Plaintiff failed to do so, the case would be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3); and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, which was due on September 11, 2018;

When Plaintiff filed his complaint, he completed a "Consent & Registration Form to Receive Documents Electronically." (Docket No. 1-2.) The Court's August 22, 2018 Order was electronically mailed to Plaintiff on that date. --------

THEREFORE,

IT IS on this 17th day of September, 2018

ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this matter as CLOSED.

s/ Noel L. Hillman

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. At Camden, New Jersey


Summaries of

Abdullah v. Oaks Integrated Care

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 17, 2018
1:18-cv-13011-NLH-AMD (D.N.J. Sep. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Abdullah v. Oaks Integrated Care

Case Details

Full title:ASMAR SIDDIQ MUMIN ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, v. OAKS INTEGRATED CARE, JANICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Sep 17, 2018

Citations

1:18-cv-13011-NLH-AMD (D.N.J. Sep. 17, 2018)