Opinion
No. 16-70553
08-23-2018
ABDELRAHMAN AAA BASEET, AKA Abdel Rahman Baseet, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Agency No. A078-007-195 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Abdelrahman AAA Baseet, a native of Saudi Arabia and a citizen of Jordan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo questions of law. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The BIA did not err or abuse its discretion in denying Baseet's motion to reopen as untimely, where he filed the motion more than six years after his final order of removal, and did not show the motion was subject to any exceptions to the filing deadline. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), (3).
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA's decision not to reopen proceedings sua sponte because Baseet's contentions do not amount to a claim of legal or constitutional error. See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) ("[T]his court has jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or constitutional error.").
In light of our disposition, we do not reach Baseet's contentions regarding eligibility for relief.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.