From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ABCO MOVING STORAGE CORP. v. NEW YORK TEL

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
May 25, 1948
193 Misc. 96 (N.Y. Misc. 1948)

Opinion

May 25, 1948.

Herbert Burstein for plaintiff.

Ralph W. Brown, Irving W. Young and Jordan R. Bassett for defendant.


Plaintiff seeks an injunction to restrain defendant pendente lite from refusing acceptance of plaintiff's advertisements in the classified telephone directories. No clear right to such relief has been demonstrated. In my opinion, the telephone company in publishing a classified directory does not perform an essential public service except with respect to ordinary listings therein. As to advertisements the position of a telephone company is analogous to that of the publisher of a newspaper or magazine. Furthermore, the refusal to accept the advertisements has not been shown to be arbitrary. Defendant has submitted sufficient facts to show that it acted reasonably in so refusing because of recent events involving the president of plaintiff corporation in connection with a similar business. Motion is denied.


Summaries of

ABCO MOVING STORAGE CORP. v. NEW YORK TEL

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
May 25, 1948
193 Misc. 96 (N.Y. Misc. 1948)
Case details for

ABCO MOVING STORAGE CORP. v. NEW YORK TEL

Case Details

Full title:ABCO MOVING STORAGE CORP., Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: May 25, 1948

Citations

193 Misc. 96 (N.Y. Misc. 1948)
83 N.Y.S.2d 448

Citing Cases

F. H. Von Damm, Inc. v. New York Telephone Co.

Again, in Case No. 12190, decided February 6, 1946: "The business of publishing the directory is incidental…

Videon Corporation v. Burton

However, there is weighty authority to the contrary. Mr. Justice Pecora (Abco Moving Storage Corp. v. New…