From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abc Sand & Rock Co. v. Cnty. of Maricopa

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 17, 2015
627 F. App'x 626 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 13-17542

12-17-2015

ABC SAND AND ROCK COMPANY INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COUNTY OF MARICOPA; MARICOPA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT; TIMOTHY PHILLIPS; JANE DOE PHILLIPS; JACK GUZMAN; JANE DOE GUZMAN; MIKE JONES; JANE DOE JONES; ED RALEIGH; JANE DOE RALEIGH; DEWAYNE JUSTICE; JANE DOE JUSTICE; MELVIN MARTIN; JANE DOE MARTIN; HEMANT PATEL; JANE DOE PATEL; SCOTT WARD; JANE DOE WARD; WYLIE BEARUP; JANE DOE BEARUP; UNKNOWN PARTIES, John Doe County Employees I-X, Jane Doe County Employees I-X, John Does I-X, and Jane Does I-X, Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00058-NVW MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 9, 2015 San Francisco, California Before: KOZINSKI, BYBEE and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. --------

The motions to take judicial notice are GRANTED.

AFFIRMED with regard to the federal claims for the reasons stated by the district court. The state law claims are REMANDED to the district court with instructions to remand to the state court for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Abc Sand & Rock Co. v. Cnty. of Maricopa

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 17, 2015
627 F. App'x 626 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Abc Sand & Rock Co. v. Cnty. of Maricopa

Case Details

Full title:ABC SAND AND ROCK COMPANY INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COUNTY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 17, 2015

Citations

627 F. App'x 626 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

ABC Sand & Rock Co. v. Maricopa Cnty.

ABC appealed the district court's ruling, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. ABC Sand and Rock Co. Inc. v. Cnty.…