Dist. Ct. App. 1995) ("[A]ccording unusual weight to a decision on an issue rendered by a federal circuit in which the state is located is an appropriate method for deciding federal questions where there is no Supreme Court authority[.]"); Littlefield v. State , 480 A.2d 731, 737 (Me. 1984) ("[I]n the interests of existing harmonious federal-state relationships, it is a wise policy that a state court of last resort accept, so far as reasonably possible, a decision of its federal circuit court on ... a federal question."); Abbott v. Goodwin , 105 Or.App. 132, 804 P.2d 485, 490 (1991) (stating that although not bound by lower federal court decisions, "under principles of federalism, we not only defer to federal court precedents, we should give weight to those of the Ninth Circuit, in which Oregon lies"), modified on other grounds , 106 Or.App. 716, 809 P.2d 716 (1991).CompareBeauty Plus Trading, Co. v. Adamo , 2018 WL 846918, at *1–2 (D.N.J. Feb. 13, 2018) (adopting narrow approach), Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandhu , 291 F. Supp. 3d 659, 669–70 (E.D. Pa. 2018) (same), Tactical Pers. Leasing, Inc. v. Hajduk , 2018 WL 4740195, *2–3 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2018) (same), and Adv. Fluid Sys., Inc. v. Huber , 28 F. Supp. 3d 306, 329 (M.D. Pa. 2014) (same) withChubb Ina Hldgs. Inc. v. Chang , 2017 WL 499682, at *6–7 (D.N.J. Feb. 7, 2017) (denying dismissal of CFAA claims and citing Citrin favorably) and Spinello Cos. v. Silva , 2014 WL 4896530, at *3–4 (D.N.J. Sept. 30, 2014) (same).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded January 9, 1991. Reconsideration allowed by opinion April 24, 1991 See 106 Or. App. 716, 809 P.2d 716 (1991) Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Kathleen B. Nachtigal, Judge.