Opinion
Submitted January 23, 1894
Decided February 6, 1894
Martin J. Keogh for appellants.
Albert A. Abbott for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Abbey v. Mace
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 6, 1894
36 N.E. 228 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
Abbey v. Mace
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 6, 1894
36 N.E. 228 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
Abbey v. Mace
Case Details
Full title:HARTWELL ABBEY, Respondent, v . LEVI H. MACE et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 6, 1894
Citations
36 N.E. 228 (N.Y. 1894)
141 N.Y. 574
57 N.Y. St. Rptr. 867
Citing Cases
Taylor v. Goelet
The last case above cited involved a modified contract which fixed no time for completion. The plaintiffs…
Reizen v. SteiglitzI concur fully in the conclusion reached by my colleagues but believe that plaintiff is entitled also to…