finding that the attorney-client privilege did not attach to communication between the insurance company and its attorney as against the assignee of the insured's claims against the insurance company
Summary of this case from Med. Assurance Co. v. WeinbergerNo. 74-64.
October 21, 1974, October TERM, 1974.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 494 F. 2d 799.
finding that the attorney-client privilege did not attach to communication between the insurance company and its attorney as against the assignee of the insured's claims against the insurance company
Summary of this case from Med. Assurance Co. v. Weinbergerfinding that the attorney-client privilege did not attach to communication between the insurance company and its attorney as against the assignee of the insured's claims against the insurance company
Summary of this case from McGrath v. Everest National Insurance CompanyFull title:ABATE ET AL. v. PITTSBURGH PLATE GLASS Co. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 21, 1974
ement: (1) the likelihood of success at trial (including the likelihood of establishing liability on the part…
United States v. MirandaMoreover, it is at least doubtful whether the District of Columbia Circuit has materially altered that…