From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abarca v. Merck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA / FRESNO DIVISION
Aug 9, 2011
Case No.: 1:07-CV-0388 OWW DLB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:07-CV-0388 OWW DLB

08-09-2011

ABARCA, RAUL VALENCIA, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERCK & CO., INC., etc., et al., Defendants.

MICHAEL J. BIDART #60582 RICARDO ECHEVERRIA #166049 SHERNOFF BIDART ECHEVERRIA LLP MICHAEL G. MARDEROSIAN #77296 BRETT L. RUNYON #133501 HEATHER S. COHEN #263093 MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE & LEHMAN THOMAS V. GIRARDI #36603 SHAWN McCANN #227553 GIRARDI & KEESE JACK SILVER #160575 LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER Post Office Box 5469 Santa Rosa, CA 95402 Attorneys for Plaintiffs


MICHAEL J. BIDART #60582

RICARDO ECHEVERRIA #166049

SHERNOFF BIDART ECHEVERRIA LLP

MICHAEL G. MARDEROSIAN #77296

BRETT L. RUNYON #133501

HEATHER S. COHEN #263093

MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE & LEHMAN

THOMAS V. GIRARDI #36603

SHAWN McCANN #227553

GIRARDI & KEESE

JACK SILVER #160575

LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER

Post Office Box 5469

Santa Rosa, CA 95402

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CORRECTED ORDER APPROVING

DISBURSEMENT OF THE

SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS

The Court, having considered and approved:

1. The Settlement Agreements entered into between the plaintiffs and the Merced Irrigation District/Merced Drainage District No. 1, the County of Merced, the Franklin County Water District, and the City of Merced;

2. The Applications for Good Faith Settlement filed by the Merced Irrigation District/Merced Drainage District No. 1, the County of Merced, the Franklin County Water District, and the City of Merced;

3. The Petitions for Approval of Minors Compromise and Declarations of the Guardian Ad Litem in Support of the Petitions;

4. The Orders Regarding Settlement pertaining to the Plaintiffs' settlement with the Merced Irrigation District/Merced Drainage District No. 1 and the County of Merced;

5. The Stipulated Dismissal and Order Dismissing Defendant City of Merced;

6. The Stipulated Dismissal and Order Dismissing Defendant Franklin County Water District;

7. The Findings of Fact Regarding the: (1) Partial Settlement With the Merced irrigation District/Merced Drainage District No. 1; (2) Partial Settlement with the County of Merced; (3) Settlement with the Franklin County Water District; and (4) Settlement with the City of Merced; and

8. The correspondence from Barbara Wright, Senior Technical Advisor for the Division of Medicare Debt Management, Office of Financial Management/Financial Services Group, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The Court finds:

1. The letter identified in Paragraph 8 above from Barbara Wright, Senior Technical Advisor for the Division of Medicare Debt Management, Office of Financial Management/Financial Services Group, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, is sufficient to fulfill the plaintiffs' obligations under the Settlement Agreements with each of the defendants;

2. The plaintiffs have complied with their obligations regarding the Distribution of Settlement Proceeds under the Settlement Agreement and therefore, the Settlement Proceeds that have been held in the Shernoff Bidart Echeverria LLP Trust Account may be utilized by plaintiffs' counsel for use as partial reimbursement for and payment of costs incurred in prosecution of this litigation. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Oliver W. Wanger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Abarca v. Merck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA / FRESNO DIVISION
Aug 9, 2011
Case No.: 1:07-CV-0388 OWW DLB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Abarca v. Merck & Co.

Case Details

Full title:ABARCA, RAUL VALENCIA, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERCK & CO., INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA / FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:07-CV-0388 OWW DLB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)