First, Plaintiff met his burden of establishing that he was a prevailing party under the EAJA because the Court entered a judgment reversing the Commissioner's denial of benefits and remanding the case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A “sentence four” remand qualifies the plaintiff as the prevailing party for EAJA purposes. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300-02 (1993); see also Abagail K. v. Kijakazi, Case No. 22-cv-318 (NEB/LIB), 2022 WL 17345355, at *2 (D. Minn. Oct. 14, 2022), report and recommendation adopted, Case No. 22-CV-318 (NEB/LIB), 2022 WL 17342417 (D. Minn. Nov. 30, 2022) (“A ‘sentence four' remand renders a plaintiff the ‘prevailing party' under the EAJA.”)