Opinion
2002-05343.
December 1, 2003.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated May 17, 2002, as granted those branches of the defendants' motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the defendant Kane Products, Inc., separately appeals from stated portions of the same order.
Alan R. Inwood (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Siegel, New York, N.Y. (Stephanie A. Johnson of counsel), for respondent and respondent-appellant.
Before: STEPHEN G. CRANE, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal by the defendant Kane Products, Inc., is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the plaintiff; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants.
The plaintiff allegedly was injured on a rainy day when he slipped and fell on an oily substance located in front of the cashier's booth of a gas station owned and operated by the defendant Merit Oil of New York, Inc. (hereinafter Merit). Three years earlier, the defendant Kane Products, Inc. (hereinafter Kane), had been hired to clean and treat the canopy covering the front of the cashier's booth with a substance to prevent leaking. The plaintiff testified that the substance on which he slipped was a combination of water, which was leaking from the canopy, and oil.
In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, Merit established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it neither created nor had notice of the combined oil and water condition that allegedly caused the plaintiff to slip and fall ( see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836). In opposition, the expert's affidavit submitted by the plaintiff was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact.
Further, although Kane's contract with Merit contained a 10-year warranty, Kane owed no duty to the plaintiff ( see Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v. Y.B.H. Realty Corp., 76 N.Y.2d 220, 226; see also Perkins v. Cosmopolitan Care Corp., 308 A.D.2d 437 [2d Dept, Sept. 8, 2003]; Espinal v. Melville Snow Contrs., 98 N.Y.2d 136).
SANTUCCI, J.P., ADAMS, CRANE and COZIER, JJ., concur.