From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1929
168 N.E. 426 (N.Y. 1929)

Opinion

Argued June 11, 1929

Decided July 11, 1929

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Thomas J. Blake and Samuel Williston for appellant.

William E. Carnochan, Walter Wilcox, Theodore C. Richards and Tompkins McIlvaine for respondent.


The judgment should be affirmed with costs on the ground that the agreement whereby the vendor and vendee were to endeavor to dispose of the goods during the pendency of the litigation had the effect of charging the defendant with liability for storage of any goods not sold, even if such liability might otherwise have been disclaimed.

CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

A.B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1929
168 N.E. 426 (N.Y. 1929)
Case details for

A.B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Company

Case Details

Full title:A.B. MURRAY CO., INC., Respondent, v. LIDGERWOOD MANUFACTURING COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 11, 1929

Citations

168 N.E. 426 (N.Y. 1929)
168 N.E. 426

Citing Cases

A.B. Murray Co. Inc. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Co.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 251 N.Y.…