From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AAT Bioquest, Inc. v. Tex. Fluorescence Labs., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 15, 2017
2016-2056 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 15, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2056

02-15-2017

AAT BIOQUEST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant

KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DEBORAH E. FISHMAN. RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendant-appellant.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03909-DMR, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DEBORAH E. FISHMAN. RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendant-appellant. Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

On this limited record and in light of the arguments raised, the district court judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

AAT Bioquest, Inc. v. Tex. Fluorescence Labs., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 15, 2017
2016-2056 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 15, 2017)
Case details for

AAT Bioquest, Inc. v. Tex. Fluorescence Labs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AAT BIOQUEST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 15, 2017

Citations

2016-2056 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 15, 2017)