From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aarstad v. BNSF Ry. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 24, 2019
No. 19-35305 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-35305

05-24-2019

KOREY AARSTAD; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; JOHN SWING, Defendants-Appellants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00072-BMM-JTJ MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana
Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 16, 2019 Portland, Oregon Before: N.R. SMITH, WATFORD, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. --------

Neither the magistrate judge nor the district court has addressed whether the "principal injuries resulting from the alleged conduct or any related conduct of each defendant were incurred" in Montana. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(4)(A)(i)(III). Because we do not typically make such determinations in the first instance, we vacate the district court's order remanding the case to Montana state court, and remand to the district court to consider this issue in the first instance. We express no opinion regarding the merits of any other issues raised by the parties on appeal before this court.

VACATED and REMANDED.

The Appellees' motion for judicial notice is DENIED. Each party shall bear their own costs.


Summaries of

Aarstad v. BNSF Ry. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 24, 2019
No. 19-35305 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2019)
Case details for

Aarstad v. BNSF Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:KOREY AARSTAD; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 24, 2019

Citations

No. 19-35305 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2019)