From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A. Secondino Son, Inc. v. L. D. Land

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven at New Haven
Mar 13, 1995
1995 Ct. Sup. 2262 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1995)

Opinion

No. CV-94-0359726-S

March 13, 1995


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE (#113)


The four counts contained in the substituted complaint dated January 12, 1995, three of which the motion seeks to strike, are each alternative theories of recovery which the plaintiff is entitled to plead. Depending on the evidence offered during the trial and the conceded or contested issues at that point, one or more of these counts may be improper. That determination cannot be made at this time.

The motion to strike is denied.

Hadden, J.


Summaries of

A. Secondino Son, Inc. v. L. D. Land

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven at New Haven
Mar 13, 1995
1995 Ct. Sup. 2262 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1995)
Case details for

A. Secondino Son, Inc. v. L. D. Land

Case Details

Full title:A. SECONDINO SON, INC. v. L. D. LAND COMPANY, ROBERT LITSKY AND STEPHEN…

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven at New Haven

Date published: Mar 13, 1995

Citations

1995 Ct. Sup. 2262 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1995)

Citing Cases

Charlie Brown, Inc. v. Northeast Hotel

Chaspek Manufacturing Corp. v. Tandet, supra. "A simple contract breach is not sufficient to establish a…