From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

9999 Holdings v. Max Heatherington

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jun 25, 2009
No. 13-04-00618-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2009)

Opinion

No. 13-04-00618-CV

Opinion delivered and filed June 25, 2009.

On appeal from the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices YAÑEZ and BENAVIDES.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This appeal was abated by this Court on March 24, 2005, due to the bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally Tex. R. App. P. 8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On May 15, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal. The order notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in reinstatement and dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.

The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).


Summaries of

9999 Holdings v. Max Heatherington

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jun 25, 2009
No. 13-04-00618-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2009)
Case details for

9999 Holdings v. Max Heatherington

Case Details

Full title:9999 HOLDINGS, INC. AND GEORGE KOUMBIS, Appellants, v. MAX HEATHERINGTON…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Jun 25, 2009

Citations

No. 13-04-00618-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2009)