From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

98 Delancey Street Corporation v. Barocas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 1949
275 App. Div. 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Summary

In 98 Delancey St. Corp. v. Barocas (82 N.Y.S.2d 802, affd. 275 App. Div. 651), Judge PECORA found a condition subsequent because a valuable leasehold was at stake and the default consisted of failure to make a minor repair.

Summary of this case from Jamaica Builders Corp. v. Buttelman

Opinion

February 7, 1949.

Present — Dore, J.P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

98 Delancey Street Corporation v. Barocas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 1949
275 App. Div. 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

In 98 Delancey St. Corp. v. Barocas (82 N.Y.S.2d 802, affd. 275 App. Div. 651), Judge PECORA found a condition subsequent because a valuable leasehold was at stake and the default consisted of failure to make a minor repair.

Summary of this case from Jamaica Builders Corp. v. Buttelman
Case details for

98 Delancey Street Corporation v. Barocas

Case Details

Full title:98 DELANCEY STREET CORPORATION, Respondent, v. SARAH BAROCAS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Matter of A.D.W. Realty v. Dee-Dee Cafe

( Trent v. Corwin, 76 N.Y.S.2d 198, 202.) "Forfeitures are not favored in equity [and] technicalities will…

18 Assocs., LLC v. Court St. Pizza, Inc.

The Court likes the manner in which it was said in the old case of Trent v. Corwin, Sup., 76 N.Y.S.2d 198,…