From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

95 Van Dam Corporation v. V-Dog Home Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2002
291 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

327

February 26, 2002.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered October 25, 2001, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff damages for breach of contract in the total amount of $12,296.75, but included no award for lost profits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Jeffrey R. Metz for plaintiff-appellant.

Stuart A. Klein for defendant-respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin, Rubin, JJ.


The trial court properly determined that plaintiff, the owner of two condominium units in defendant condominium association's building, was not entitled to damages for rental income it allegedly lost due to defendant's breach of the condominium by-laws, when defendant refused to sign plaintiff's application with the New York City Department of Buildings seeking permission for plaintiff to alter its leasable cellar space. Plaintiff failed to establish that it lost profits caused by the breach.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

95 Van Dam Corporation v. V-Dog Home Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2002
291 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

95 Van Dam Corporation v. V-Dog Home Corp.

Case Details

Full title:95 VAN DAM CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. V-DOG HOME CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 856