From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

831 Knickerbocker, LLC v. For An Order & Judgment Pursuant To Article 4 of The N.Y. Civil Practice Laws & Rules

Supreme Court, Kings County
Jan 18, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 30223 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)

Opinion

Index 513251/2021

01-18-2022

In the Matter of the Application of 831 KNICKERBOCKER, LLC, Petitioner, v. FOR AN ORDER AND JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 4 OF THE NEW YORK CIVIL PRACTICE LAWS AND RULES AND SECTION 881 OF THE NEW YORK REAL PROPERY ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS LAW FOR ACCESS AND ENTRY TO ADJOINING PROPERTY Defendants.


Unpublished Opinion

DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFAULT

CARL J. LANDICINO, J.S.C.

Recitation, as required by CPLR 2219(a), of the papers considered in the review of this motion:

Papers Numbered (NYSCEF)

Notice of Motion/Cross Motion and Affidavits (Affirmations) Annexed...........................................1-10, 14, 21

Affidavits of Service................................................................... 15, 16, 20, 23, 25, 28, 29, 31-33, Memorandum of Law.................................................................. 12

UPON review of the Verified Petition dated May 26, 2021; the Affidavit of Yehuda Cohen duly sworn to on June 2, 2021 and the exhibits attached thereto; the Affidavit of Wu Chen, P.E., duly sworn to on May 26, 2021 and the exhibits attached thereto; the annexed accompanying memorandum of law, Petitioner 831 Knickerbocker LLC ("Petitioner"), having moved by order to show cause for an order pursuant to Real Property Actions and Proceedings § 881 for a license to enter respondents Rafael Guzman and Jose Perez-Constantino's (together, "Respondents") property located at 835 Knickerbocker Avenue, Brooklyn, New York ("Respondents' Property"), for a period of approximately eighteen (18) months from the date Petitioner is granted access to Respondents' Property, to enable Petitioner to install, maintain, and remove the following property protections on the Respondents' Property (the "Property Protection"): (i) a pre-construction survey of the portions of the Respondents' Property that will be impacted by the Temporary Protections (defined below) consisting of non-invasive photographic survey of existing conditions on Respondents' Property; (ii) monitoring equipment, including but not limited to remote access vibration monitors* optical monitors, and crack monitors, to the extent necessary, on Respondents' Property; (iii) weatherproofing of the exposed portion of the exterior of Respondents' Property and flashing between the building at Respondents' Property and the new building at Petitioner's Property ("Weatherproofing"); (iv) access to the air space above Respondents' Property in order to install and maintain an outrigger system, and/or a netting system extending from the new building at Petitioner's Property and to finish the exterior of the facade of the building to be constructed on Petitioner's Property (the "Airspace Access"); (v) installation, maintenance, and removal overhead protection where needed and surface protection on the roof of the Respondents' (together with the Airspace Access, the "Temporary Protection"); and (vi) the extension, modification or relocation of the chimneys, flues, exhausts and vents at Respondents' Property, to the extent necessary; Petitioner's Order to Show Cause having regularly come before this Court on July 7, 2021 and Petitioner demonstrating that it timely served Respondents pursuant to the Order to Show Cause signed by the Honorable Lillian Wan, J.S.C.; Respondents having failed to file opposition and having failed to appear before this Court on July 7, 2021, the return date of Petitioner's Order to Show Cause; Petitioner's Order to Show Cause having come before the Court on October 13, 2021 pursuant to this Court's Order dated July 22, 2021 and Petitioner demonstrating that it timely served Respondents pursuant to this Court's Order dated July 22, 2021; Respondents having failed to file opposition and having failed to appear before this Court on October 13, 2021, the return date of Petitioner's Order to Show Cause; Petitioner's Order to Show Cause having come before this Court on December 2, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. for a hearing in relation to Petitioner's Order to Show Cause pursuant to this Court's Order dated October 20, 2021, and Petitioner demonstrating that it timely served Respondents pursuant to this Court's Order dated October 20, 2021 and providing the testimony of Yehuda Cohen and Wu Chen, P.E. on behalf of Petitioner; Respondents having failed to file opposition and having failed to contact or appear before this Court on December 2, 2021, the hearing date of Petitioner's Order to Show Cause;

NOW, upon motion of Harris Bricken Sliwoski, LLP, attorneys for Petitioner, it is:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition brought by Order to Show Cause seeking a license to enter onto Respondent's Property pursuant to RPAPL § 881, upon the default of the Respondents, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further, ORDERED that Petitioner is granted a limited license to enter the EXTERIOR of Respondents' Property located at 835 Knickerbocker Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11207 (Block: 3425, Lot: 7) for a period of eighteen (18) months commencing 5 business days from service of this Decision and Order as provided herein to:

(i) perform a pre-construction survey of only the EXTERIOR portions of the Respondents' Property that will be impacted by the Temporary Protections (as defined herein) consisting of non-invasive photographic survey of existing conditions on Respondents' Property. Petitioners may REQUEST of the
Respondents access to the interior of the Respondents' Property to perform a pre-construction survey, provided however, that Petitioner is not permitted to access the interior of the Respondents' Property without the consent of the Respondents. Petitioner's right to seek an order granting access to the interior of the Respondents' Property to perform a pre-construction survey is denied without prejudice to renew on good cause shown;
(ii) install monitoring equipment, including but not limited to remote access vibration monitors, optical monitors, and crack monitors, to the extent necessary, on the EXTERIOR Respondents' Property;
(iii) install weatherproofing on the exposed portion of the exterior of Respondents' Property and flashing between the building at Respondents' Property and the new building at Petitioner's Property ("Weatherproofing");
(iv) access to the air space above the Respondents' Property in order to install and maintain an outrigger system, and/or a netting system extending from the new building at Petitioner's Property and to finish the exterior of the facade of the building to be constructed on Petitioner's Property (the "Airspace Access"); and
(v) install, maintain, and remove overhead protection where needed and surface protection on the roof of the Respondents' Property (together with the Airspace Access, the "Temporary Protection"); and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner's request to extend, modify or relocate the chimneys, flues, exhausts and vents at Respondents' Property is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. In the event Petitioner determines that extending, modifying, or relocating the chimneys, flues, exhausts and vents at Respondents' Property is necessary, Petitioner may make a further application for an order granting permission to extend, modify or relocate the chimneys, flues, exhausts and vents at Respondents' Property upon notice and upon good cause shown; and it is further

ORDERED that in the event Petitioner's requires access to the Respondents' Property to perform a pre-construction inspection of the interior of the Respondents' Property and/or to extend, modify or relocate the chimneys, flues, exhausts and vents at Respondents' Property, Petitioner shall make an application for such access by Order to Show Cause and shall include the factual and legal basis for the requested access and provide for service of all necessary parties, including but not limited to the occupants of the Respondents' Property; and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner shall not unreasonably interfere with Respondents' necessary access to their property and quality of life, and shall take the necessary steps, measures and precautions to prevent and avoid any damage to Respondent's Property; and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner shall indemnify and hold Respondents harmless to the fullest extent permitted by law for any liability, claims, damages or losses that Respondents may incur as a result of Petitioner's access to Respondents' Property; and it is further

ORDERED Petitioner is not granted access to perform any underpinning or any other permanent encroachment on the Respondent's Property, and it is further

ORDERED Petitioner's workmen and contractors are allowed access to respondent's air space only from Mondays through Fridays, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and it is further

ORDERED Petitioner and its contractor shall each procure insurance (occurrence policy), in the amount of $1,000,000.00, per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 aggregate, covering each Respondent by name, and listing 835 Knickerbocker Avenue, Brooklyn, N.Y., including any improvements thereon, as part of the covered work site, for any liability and damage Respondent may incur for property damage, personal injury, or wrongful death, including any liability under the Labor Law, as a result of Petitioner's work, whether or not caused by the negligence of Petitioner or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, and providing Respondent first-party benefits to cover any damage to their property, including damage caused by earth movement. Petitioner shall maintain this insurance for the duration of this limited license, and it is further;

ORDERED Petitioner shall indemnify and hold Respondent harmless to the fullest extent permitted by law for any liability, claims, damages or losses, including attorneys' fees the Respondent may incur as a result of Petitioner's work, whether or not caused by the negligence of Petitioner or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, and it is further

ORDERED Petitioner shall immediately report, in writing, to Respondent any damage to Respondent's property caused by Petitioner's work, and it is further

ORDERED Petitioner shall cure any violation placed against Respondent's property by a governmental or administrative agency as a result of Petitioner's work. Petitioner shall reimburse respondent for any fines or penalties imposed as a result of such violations, and it is further

ORDERED Petitioner shall take all steps necessary to remove any mechanic's lien, or other encumbrance, against Respondent's property arising from Petitioner's work or use of Respondent's air space, and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner shall be liable to Respondents for any damages which Respondents' Property may suffer as a result of the granting of this Order and all damaged property shall be repaired at the sole expense of Petitioner; and it is further

ORDERED that upon the completion of the term of the license afforded by this Order, or completion of the Petitioner's work whichever is earlier, Petitioner shall return the area of Respondents' Property which Petitioner has accessed to its original condition, and all materials used in construction, including temporary protections, and any debris shall be removed from the license area within 20 days; and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner is solely responsible for the installation, maintenance and removal of the temporary protections licensed by this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry by Certified Mail and Overnight Mail upon each Respondent within ten (10) business days of entry of this Decision and Order.

This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.


Summaries of

831 Knickerbocker, LLC v. For An Order & Judgment Pursuant To Article 4 of The N.Y. Civil Practice Laws & Rules

Supreme Court, Kings County
Jan 18, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 30223 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)
Case details for

831 Knickerbocker, LLC v. For An Order & Judgment Pursuant To Article 4 of The N.Y. Civil Practice Laws & Rules

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of 831 KNICKERBOCKER, LLC, Petitioner, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Kings County

Date published: Jan 18, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 30223 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)