Opinion
2:22-cv-1662-JAD-DJA
11-14-2022
705 DEAN MARTIN, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs, v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; DOES I through X and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES XI through XX inclusive, Defendants.
Krista J. Nielson Attorneys for Defendants Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and National Default Servicing Corporation John Henry Wright, Attorney for Plaintiff, 705 Dean Martin, LLC
Krista J. Nielson Attorneys for Defendants Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and National Default Servicing Corporation
John Henry Wright, Attorney for Plaintiff, 705 Dean Martin, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REMAND (FIRST REQUEST) ECF Nos. 21, 22
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A.
Plaintiff, 705 Dean Martin, LLC (“705”) and Defendants, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (“SLS”) and National Default Servicing Corporation (“NDSC”), by and through undersigned and respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants, SLS and NDSC shall have additional time, up to and including December 5, 2022 to file its Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Motion to Remand. The current deadline for the Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss is November 14, 2022 and the current deadline for the Opposition to Motion to Remand is November 15, 2022. The parties enter into this stipulation to accommodate time and scheduling constraints on counsel for SLS and NDSC.
This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
Dated this 10th day of November, 2022. Dated this 10th day of November, 2022.
THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP, P.C.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF Nos. 21, 22] and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.