From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

698-700 Amsterdam Corp. v. Morfesis Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2000
273 A.D.2d 31 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 6, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered on or about January 8, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied plaintiff's motion for an order rescinding a residential lease agreement entered into by an interim receiver with defendant tenant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Peter J. Pruzan, for plaintiff-appellant.

Todd L. Piorier, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Williams, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin, JJ.


Plaintiff's appellate contention that the lease agreement entered into between the receiver and defendant tenant should be rescinded on the ground of mutual mistake is unpreserved and we decline to reach it since neither the receiver nor defendant tenant had a full and fair opportunity to respond to plaintiff's claim, that the lease between the receiver and defendant tenant was entered into upon the mistaken belief that there was a registered stabilized rent for the subject apartment.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

698-700 Amsterdam Corp. v. Morfesis Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2000
273 A.D.2d 31 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

698-700 Amsterdam Corp. v. Morfesis Realty

Case Details

Full title:698-700 AMSTERDAM CORP., ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MORFESIS REALTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 6, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 31 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 865