From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

66 Drive-In, Inc. v. Hycel Partners III, L.P.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
May 2, 1995
897 S.W.2d 203 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 66845.

May 2, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ALPHONSO H. VOORHEES, JUDGE.

Daniel T. Rabbitt, Matthew J. Sauter, Rabbitt, Pitzer Snodgrass, St. Louis, for appellant.

Bryan Cave, Gerard T. Carmody, Dan M. Lesicko, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., GRIMM, C.J., and KAROHL, J.


ORDER


Plaintiff 66 Drive-In appeals the dismissal of its petition against the guarantors of a development agreement for interest on plaintiff's condemnation award after the developer abandoned the condemnation of plaintiff's land.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16 (b).


Summaries of

66 Drive-In, Inc. v. Hycel Partners III, L.P.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
May 2, 1995
897 S.W.2d 203 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

66 Drive-In, Inc. v. Hycel Partners III, L.P.

Case Details

Full title:66 DRIVE-IN, INC., PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. HYCEL PARTNERS III, L.P., HYCEL…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: May 2, 1995

Citations

897 S.W.2d 203 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

66, Inc. v. Crestwood Commons Redevelopment

The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal. 66, Inc. v. Hycel Partners III, L.P., 897 S.W.2d 203 (Mo. App.…

66, Inc. v. Crestwood Commons Redev

The trial court dismissed the guaranty action in August, 1994, which we affirmed. 66 Drive-In, Inc. v. Hycel…