From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

610 W. Realty LLC v. Riverview W. Contracting LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 3, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2622 155357/13

01-03-2017

610 West Realty LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Riverview West Contracting LLC, et al., Defendants, B & Contracting Enterprises, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.

Silverman Shin & Byrne PLLC, New York (Andrew Achiron of counsel), for appellant. London Fischer LLP, New York (Brian A. Kalman of counsel), for respondent.


Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Gische, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.

Silverman Shin & Byrne PLLC, New York (Andrew Achiron of counsel), for appellant.

London Fischer LLP, New York (Brian A. Kalman of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered August 4, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of defendant B & V Contracting Enterprises, Inc. (B & V) for summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action alleging negligence as against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff was the sponsor of a condominium construction project, on which defendant Riverview West Contracting LLC was the general contractor, and B & V was a subcontractor hired by Riverview to perform certain carpentry and drywall work. Following the completion and opening of the condominium complex, it was discovered that B & V had performed certain of its work negligently.

The court properly dismissed the fourth cause of action alleging negligence against B & V, and seeking the cost of remediation and repair of B & V's negligent work, because plaintiff cannot recover contract damages under a negligence theory (see 532 Madison Ave. Gourmet Foods v Finlandia Ctr. , 96 NY2d 280 [2001]; Residential Bd. of Mgrs. of Zeckendorf Towers v Union Sq.-14th Assoc. , 190 AD2d 636 [1st Dept 1993]). The fact that B & V's work had to do with fire-safing and fire-stopping the premises is not sufficient to create an independent duty to plaintiff (see Church v Callanan Indus. , 99 NY2d 104, 112 [2002]), and there is no allegation that B & V launched a force or instrument of harm (see Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs. , 98 NY2d 136, 140 [2002]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 3, 2017

CLERK


Summaries of

610 W. Realty LLC v. Riverview W. Contracting LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 3, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

610 W. Realty LLC v. Riverview W. Contracting LLC

Case Details

Full title:610 West Realty LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Riverview West Contracting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 3, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)