5350 Park, LLC v. Grycon, LLC

Full title: 5350 PARK, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. GRYCON, LLC, etc., Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Feb 23, 2022

336 So. 3d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D21-1097

02-23-2022

5350 PARK, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. GRYCON, LLC, etc., Appellee.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, and Felix X. Rodriguez and Kelly R. Melchiondo, Miami, for appellant. Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., and Richard H. Critchlow and Deborah S. Corbishley, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, and Felix X. Rodriguez and Kelly R. Melchiondo, Miami, for appellant.

Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., and Richard H. Critchlow and Deborah S. Corbishley, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Young v. Achenbauch, 136 So. 3d 575, 581 (Fla. 2014) (explaining that a lawyer may not drop a preexisting client in favor of a new client where the representation of both clients constitutes a conflict, i.e. , the "hot potato" rule).