5350 Park, LLC v. Grycon, LLC

Full title: 5350 Park, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. Grycon, LLC, etc., Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Feb 23, 2022

No. 3D21-1097 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2022)

Opinion

3D21-1097

02-23-2022

5350 Park, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. Grycon, LLC, etc., Appellee.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, and Felix X. Rodriguez and Kelly R. Melchiondo, for appellant. Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., and Richard H. Critchlow and Deborah S. Corbishley, for appellee.

PER CURIAM

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Thomas, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 20-11660

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, and Felix X. Rodriguez and Kelly R. Melchiondo, for appellant.

Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., and Richard H. Critchlow and Deborah S. Corbishley, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM 1

Affirmed. Young v. Achenbauch, 136 So.3d 575, 581 (Fla. 2014) (explaining that a lawyer may not drop a preexisting client in favor of a new client where the representation of both clients constitutes a conflict, i.e., the "hot potato" rule). 2