discussing determination of priority of invention under § 102(g), and noting that "§ 102(g) prior art can be used for § 103", id. at 1371 n. 1, 231 USPQ 84 n. 1
Summary of this case from SUN STUDS, INC. v. ATA EQUIP. LEASING, INCNo. 86-1317.
March 30, 1987.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 803 F. 2d 1463.
discussing determination of priority of invention under § 102(g), and noting that "§ 102(g) prior art can be used for § 103", id. at 1371 n. 1, 231 USPQ 84 n. 1
Summary of this case from SUN STUDS, INC. v. ATA EQUIP. LEASING, INCFull title:49ER CHEVROLET, INC., ET AL. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 30, 1987
The presumption mandated by section 282 is applicable to all challenges to the validity of the patent.…
Weatherchem Corp. v. J.L. Clark, Inc.Demaco Corp. v. F. Von Langsdorff Licensing Ltd., 851 F.2d 1387 (Fed. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 956,…