468-A. Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Roberts (In re Attorneys in Violation § 468-a)

Full title: In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 5, 2015

2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8042 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

Attorney Registration No. 2881704

11-05-2015

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a. COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, ON MOTION Petitioner; v. KEITH JOSEPH ROBERTS, Respondent.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner. Keith Joseph Roberts, Old Tappan, New Jersey, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Keith Joseph Roberts, Old Tappan, New Jersey, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1998, was suspended by this Court's order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.