From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

433 Sutton Corp. v. Broder

Court of Appeals of New York
Apr 1, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2218 (N.Y. 2014)

Opinion

No. 123 SSM 4

04-01-2014

433 Sutton Corp., Appellant, v. Robert Broder, Respondent.

Submitted by Robert I. Cantor, for appellant. Submitted by Jeffrey M. Steinitz, for respondent.


Submitted by Robert I. Cantor, for appellant.

Submitted by Jeffrey M. Steinitz, for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, order of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated, and certified question answered in the negative. The Appellate Division erred in determining that defendant was the prevailing party. Accordingly, defendant is not entitled to attorneys' fees. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.


Summaries of

433 Sutton Corp. v. Broder

Court of Appeals of New York
Apr 1, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2218 (N.Y. 2014)
Case details for

433 Sutton Corp. v. Broder

Case Details

Full title:433 Sutton Corp., Appellant, v. Robert Broder, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Apr 1, 2014

Citations

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2218 (N.Y. 2014)