From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

43-45 E. 60TH LLC v. Kim

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
Sep 16, 2004
5 Misc. 3d 1026 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2004)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In 43-45 E. 60th LLC v Kim (5 Misc 3d 1026[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51575[U] [2004]), the court cites Palermo v Lord Taylor (287 AD2d 258 [2001]) as authority for the applicability of the four-prong test, but that was a Supreme Court action involving the application of CPLR 3404.

Summary of this case from Bldg Management Co. v. Meija
See 1 Summary

Opinion

September 16, 2004.

Lebovits, J.

Dismissal and Nonsuit — Restoring Action to Calendar. Uniform Rules for Trial Courts — 22 NYCRR 208.14 (New York City Civil Court; calendar default; restoration).

Summaries of

43-45 E. 60TH LLC v. Kim

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
Sep 16, 2004
5 Misc. 3d 1026 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2004)

In 43-45 E. 60th LLC v Kim (5 Misc 3d 1026[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51575[U] [2004]), the court cites Palermo v Lord Taylor (287 AD2d 258 [2001]) as authority for the applicability of the four-prong test, but that was a Supreme Court action involving the application of CPLR 3404.

Summary of this case from Bldg Management Co. v. Meija
Case details for

43-45 E. 60TH LLC v. Kim

Case Details

Full title:43-45 E. 60th LLC v. Kim

Court:Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Sep 16, 2004

Citations

5 Misc. 3d 1026 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2004)
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51575

Citing Cases

Bldg Mgmt. Co. Inc. v. Meija

However, the presumption of abandonment and the four prong test necessary to overcome that presumption are…

Bldg Management Co. v. Meija

However, the presumption of abandonment and the four-prong test necessary to overcome that presumption are…

2 Citing Cases