From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

3D Sys. v. Wynne

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 16, 2023
21-cv-1141-LAB-DDL (S.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-1141-LAB-DDL

10-16-2023

3D SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BEN WYNNE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING RENEWED JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES

[Dkt. No. 347]

DAVID D. LESHNER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 10, 2023, the parties filed a Renewed Joint Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and Continue Pretrial Deadlines (“Renewed Joint Motion”). Dkt. No. 347. In an order dated October 3, 2023, the Court denied the parties' first joint motion seeking the same relief for failure to demonstrate good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4). Dkt. No. 339.

Rule 16(b)(4) provides that a pretrial scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge's consent.” “Rule 16(b)'s ‘good cause' standard primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking the amendment.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992).

In the Renewed Joint Motion, the parties contend that an extension of certain pretrial deadlines is necessary “for several reasons.” Dkt. No. 347 at 3. Among the reasons provided is that depositions and inspections have had to be postponed due to individuals testing positive for Covid or exhibiting flu-like symptoms. Id. at 3-4. The parties further state that the need to reschedule depositions and inspections close to the initial expert report deadline on October 27, 2023, has generated “significant concerns about whether [the parties'] experts will have sufficient time to review the transcripts of deposition,” “conduct the various inspections [and] analyze the information obtained from those inspections,” and thereafter “conduct expert depositions and discovery and assess possible Daubert motions.” Id. at 4.

Based on the foregoing, the Court concludes that the parties have demonstrated good cause to modify the expert deadlines, including the deadline to file Daubert motions. The Renewed Joint Motion is GRANTED and the pretrial schedule is modified as follows:

Event

Existing Date

New Date

Deadline to comply with disclosure provisions of FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) and (C) related to all claims

October 27, 2023

November 15, 2023

Mandatory Settlement Conference (in-person)

November 17, 2023, at 9:00 a.m.

NO CHANGE

Deadline to comply with FRCP (a)(2)(D)(ii) related to all claims

November 28, 2023

December 15, 2023

Deadline to complete all expert discovery related to all claims

January 3, 2024

January 15, 2024

Deadline to file pretrial motions (excluding Daubert motions)

January 17, 2024

NO CHANGE

Event

Existing Date

New Date

Deadline to file Daubert motions

January 17, 2024

January 29, 2024

Deadline to comply with pretrial disclosure requirements of FRCP 26(a)(3)

April 19, 2024

NO CHANGE

Deadline for counsel to meet and take action as required by Civ.L.R. 16.1.f.4

April 26, 2024

NO CHANGE

Deadline for Plaintiff's counsel to provide opposing counsel with the pretrial order for review

May 3, 2024

NO CHANGE

Deadline to lodge proposed final pretrial conference order

May 15, 2024

NO CHANGE

Final pretrial conference

May 20, 2024 at 12:00 p.m.

NO CHANGE

No further extensions or modifications of the pretrial schedule will be granted absent a showing of good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

3D Sys. v. Wynne

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 16, 2023
21-cv-1141-LAB-DDL (S.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2023)
Case details for

3D Sys. v. Wynne

Case Details

Full title:3D SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BEN WYNNE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Oct 16, 2023

Citations

21-cv-1141-LAB-DDL (S.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2023)