From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

39 Great Jones v. Kirschner

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 5, 1945
184 Misc. 598 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)

Opinion

April 5, 1945.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, DI PIRRO, J.

Milton Leonard for appellant.

Jacob R. Heller for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


The uncontradicted evidence established that the tenant was in the wholesale and not retail business. The occupancy, therefore, is within the provisions of the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1944, ch. 3).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of the tenant.

SHIENTAG, McLAUGHLIN and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

39 Great Jones v. Kirschner

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 5, 1945
184 Misc. 598 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
Case details for

39 Great Jones v. Kirschner

Case Details

Full title:39 GREAT JONES, INC., Landlord, Respondent, v. SAMUEL KIRSCHNER, Tenant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1945

Citations

184 Misc. 598 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
54 N.Y.S.2d 745