Opinion
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-12344
03-28-2012
JUDGE DAVID M. LAWSON
MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL J. KOMIVES
ORDER DEEMING RESOLVED PLAINTIFF'S JANUARY 11, 2012 MOTION TO
COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES
AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION (Doc. Ent. 29)
On January 11, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to its second set of interrogatories and requests for production, whereby it requested that "defendants be ordered to serve responses to plaintiff's second set of interrogatories and requests to produce within ten days." Doc. Ent. 29 at 6. Among the attachments to this motion is a copy of plaintiff's October 31, 2011 discovery requests. Doc. Ent. 29-2.
Judge Lawson referred this motion to me for hearing and determination. Doc. Ent. 30.
On March 27, 2012, attorneys Mark F. Kruse (OH) and Douglas E. Kuthy appeared on plaintiff's behalf. Attorney Stephanie I. Marino Anderson appeared on behalf of defendants. Plaintiff's counsel informed the Court that defendants served a response to the subject discovery request on March 26, 2012.
Accordingly, plaintiff's January 11, 2012 motion to compel responses to plaintiff's second set of interrogatories and requests for production (Doc. Ent. 29) is DEEMED RESOLVED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The attention of the parties is drawn to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which provides a period of fourteen (14) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order within which to file objections for consideration by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
____________________________
PAUL J. KOMIVES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the forgoing document was sent to parties of record on March 28,2012 by electronic and/or U.S. mail.
Michael Williams
Relief Case Manager for the Honorable
Paul J. Komives