From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

3505 Realty Corp. v. Smith

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 7, 1960
28 Misc. 2d 588 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Opinion

July 7, 1960

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx, ROBERT V. SANTANGELO, J.

Samuel Weissman for appellant.

Daniel Leeds for respondent.


The statutory provision for registered mail received substantial compliance when certified mail was used and the tenant actually received notice ( Teresta v. City of New York, 304 N.Y. 440; Priester v. R.F.H. Realty Corp., 13 Misc.2d 446; Chirico v. Kings County Sav. Bank, 168 Misc. 207).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order directed for the landlord, with costs.

Concur — STEUER, J.P., HOFSTADTER and AURELIO, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

3505 Realty Corp. v. Smith

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 7, 1960
28 Misc. 2d 588 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
Case details for

3505 Realty Corp. v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:3505 REALTY CORP., Appellant, v. ANTHONY SMITH, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1960

Citations

28 Misc. 2d 588 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
207 N.Y.S.2d 518