Opinion
July 7, 1960
Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx, ROBERT V. SANTANGELO, J.
Samuel Weissman for appellant.
Daniel Leeds for respondent.
The statutory provision for registered mail received substantial compliance when certified mail was used and the tenant actually received notice ( Teresta v. City of New York, 304 N.Y. 440; Priester v. R.F.H. Realty Corp., 13 Misc.2d 446; Chirico v. Kings County Sav. Bank, 168 Misc. 207).
The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order directed for the landlord, with costs.
Concur — STEUER, J.P., HOFSTADTER and AURELIO, JJ.
Final order reversed, etc.