From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

350 Mont. v. Haaland

United States District Court, District of Montana
Feb 17, 2023
CV 19-12-M-DWM (D. Mont. Feb. 17, 2023)

Opinion

CV 19-12-M-DWM

02-17-2023

350 MONTANA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEB HAALAND, et al., Defendants, and SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor.


ORDER

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge United States District Court

On February 13, 2023, Defendant-Intervenor Signal Peak Energy, LLC (“Signal Peak”) filed a motion to clarify, (Doc. 98), the February 10, 2023 Order in this matter, (see Doc. 97). Whether or not the motion is well taken, it does not comport with Local Rule 7.3(a) nor, questionably, to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Signal Peak also filed a motion to expedite briefing on that motion. (Doc. 100.) Plaintiffs oppose the motion and Federal Defendants take no position. (Id.) Plaintiffs, if they intend to respond to one or both motions must do so by February 23, 2023. This order is not a determination of either of Signal Peak's motions. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that responses from Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants must be filed no later than February 23, 2023. Defendant-Intervenor may not reply to the parties' responses. This Order does not bear on the merits of the pending request for clarification.


Summaries of

350 Mont. v. Haaland

United States District Court, District of Montana
Feb 17, 2023
CV 19-12-M-DWM (D. Mont. Feb. 17, 2023)
Case details for

350 Mont. v. Haaland

Case Details

Full title:350 MONTANA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEB HAALAND, et al., Defendants, and…

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Feb 17, 2023

Citations

CV 19-12-M-DWM (D. Mont. Feb. 17, 2023)