From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

261 E. 78th Realty Corp. v. Bernstein

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2012
98 A.D.3d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-25

261 EAST 78TH REALTY CORP., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. William N. Bernstein, Architects, PLLC, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Georgoulis & Associates, PLLC, New York (Michael McDermott of counsel), for appellant. Milber Makris Plousadis & Seiden, LLP, White Plains (Mark Seiden of counsel), for respondents.


Georgoulis & Associates, PLLC, New York (Michael McDermott of counsel), for appellant. Milber Makris Plousadis & Seiden, LLP, White Plains (Mark Seiden of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered July 21, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint as against the individual defendant, William N. Bernstein, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered December 20, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from, upon reargument, adhered to the determination on the original motion, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Although the individual defendant signed an agreement to provide architectural services on behalf of a nonexistent corporate entity and failed to disclose that the nonexistent entity was, in fact, a “trade name” for an otherwise undisclosed principal, we note that defendant has willingly allowed its proper corporate name to be substituted. Furthermore, the complaint against the individual defendant was correctly dismissed since the parties' agreement expressly absolved the defendant of any personal liability in connection with architectural services performed under the agreement ( see generally Clinton Invs. Co., II v. Watkins, 146 A.D.2d 861, 862–863, 536 N.Y.S.2d 270 [3d Dept. 1989];Universal Indus. Corp. v. Lindstrom, 92 A.D.2d 150, 151, 459 N.Y.S.2d 492 [4th Dept. 1983];cf. Geron v. Amritraj, 82 A.D.3d 404, 405, 917 N.Y.S.2d 855 [1st Dept. 2011] ). Parties to arm's-length transactions may agree to waive claims based on personal liability ( see Lawrence v. Kennedy, 95 A.D.3d 955, 959, 944 N.Y.S.2d 577 [2d Dept. 2012] ). Moreover, contractual provisions that absolve a party of its own negligence are enforceable, absent*705evidence of gross negligence ( see Colnaghi, U.S.A. v. Jewelers Protection Servs., 81 N.Y.2d 821, 823, 595 N.Y.S.2d 381, 611 N.E.2d 282 [1993] ). Here, the complaint alleges breach of contract and professional negligence, but not gross negligence.

ANDRIAS, J.P., SWEENY, MOSKOWITZ, FREEDMAN, RICHTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

261 E. 78th Realty Corp. v. Bernstein

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2012
98 A.D.3d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

261 E. 78th Realty Corp. v. Bernstein

Case Details

Full title:261 EAST 78TH REALTY CORP., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. William N. Bernstein…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6260
950 N.Y.S.2d 704

Citing Cases

Repsol v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

See Espafia Affirm. Exs. C & F at 39. Contractual limitation on liability clauses are enforceable, except…