From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

2564 Co. v. D'Addario

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 30, 1961
35 Misc. 2d 176 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)

Opinion

November 30, 1961

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx, LOUIS PECK, J.

Bernstein Moche ( Leonard H. Moche of counsel), for appellant.

Marinello Musicant ( Morris Musicant of counsel), for respondent.


Where the landlord has presented irrefutable proof that the tenant violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay his rent when due, which necessitated 11 separate dispossess proceedings over a period from October, 1958 to May, 1960, or one every three months, a final order in favor of the landlord should have been granted ( Gilbert v. Becker, 142 N.Y.S.2d 888; 974 Realty Corp. v. Ledford, 9 Misc.2d 240; Rental Realty Corp. v. Lawrence, 14 Misc.2d 1070).

The final order in favor of tenant should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., TILZER and GOLD, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

2564 Co. v. D'Addario

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 30, 1961
35 Misc. 2d 176 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
Case details for

2564 Co. v. D'Addario

Case Details

Full title:2564 COMPANY, Appellant, v. ANGELO D'ADDARIO, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1961

Citations

35 Misc. 2d 176 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
232 N.Y.S.2d 294

Citing Cases

Spencer Scott Grp. v. Nahas

See also. Definitions Personal Fitness v. 133 E. 58* St., 107 A.D.3d 617 (1"Dept. 2013) (ten non-payment…

National Shoes v. Annex Camera

It has been uniformly held that such conduct may indeed constitute such a violation. ( Stern v Harrold, 12…